<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Was the Twitter Retweet Feature Designed to Bring Value to Google and Bing Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.muellerandrew.com/2009/11/was-the-twitter-retweet-feature-designed-to-bring-value-to-google-and-bing-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.muellerandrew.com/2009/11/was-the-twitter-retweet-feature-designed-to-bring-value-to-google-and-bing-search/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 15:20:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.muellerandrew.com/2009/11/was-the-twitter-retweet-feature-designed-to-bring-value-to-google-and-bing-search/comment-page-1/#comment-927</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 15:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muellerandrew.com/?p=184#comment-927</guid>
		<description>Hi Paul,

Yes the Twitter native retweet certainly may useful for certain situations and purposes.  Still, I think it serves a different purpose than the original and it hurts the communications potential of the platform when it attempts to replace the more versatile original.  IMO it should have be named something different.

I was very happy to see that Hootsuite now gives you a preference, I already went ahead and changed my preferences and will probably use Hootsuite more as a result.  Now, if they allowed me to great groups in addition to lists, I would be ecstatic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Paul,</p>
<p>Yes the Twitter native retweet certainly may useful for certain situations and purposes.  Still, I think it serves a different purpose than the original and it hurts the communications potential of the platform when it attempts to replace the more versatile original.  IMO it should have be named something different.</p>
<p>I was very happy to see that Hootsuite now gives you a preference, I already went ahead and changed my preferences and will probably use Hootsuite more as a result.  Now, if they allowed me to great groups in addition to lists, I would be ecstatic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Gailey</title>
		<link>http://www.muellerandrew.com/2009/11/was-the-twitter-retweet-feature-designed-to-bring-value-to-google-and-bing-search/comment-page-1/#comment-926</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Gailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 15:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muellerandrew.com/?p=184#comment-926</guid>
		<description>If there is one thing I actually like about the new style retweets is the way which they display a new face into my timeline which draws my attention  quicker than the time it takes even to skim read the old style RT which don´t do that.

I now mix up my retweets using the old style and the new style and gradually get into the habit of checking the retweet button on twitter.com. Of course some apps have integrated the new style RT´s. Nonetheless I sense  the community prefer the classic style. Only today Hootsuite launched v5 and one of the most repeated features is the ability to reset the RT in the app to the old style:

Look how popular this is:

http://search.twitter.com/search?q=HootSuite+retweet</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there is one thing I actually like about the new style retweets is the way which they display a new face into my timeline which draws my attention  quicker than the time it takes even to skim read the old style RT which don´t do that.</p>
<p>I now mix up my retweets using the old style and the new style and gradually get into the habit of checking the retweet button on twitter.com. Of course some apps have integrated the new style RT´s. Nonetheless I sense  the community prefer the classic style. Only today Hootsuite launched v5 and one of the most repeated features is the ability to reset the RT in the app to the old style:</p>
<p>Look how popular this is:</p>
<p><a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=HootSuite+retweet" rel="nofollow">http://search.twitter.com/search?q=HootSuite+retweet</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.muellerandrew.com/2009/11/was-the-twitter-retweet-feature-designed-to-bring-value-to-google-and-bing-search/comment-page-1/#comment-439</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muellerandrew.com/?p=184#comment-439</guid>
		<description>Spot on Carl, everything you say is 100% accurate.  The native twitter retweet feature cripples the conversational and to some extent social aspects of the platform.  The other main twitter feature &quot;lists&quot; to some extent does the same thing when you compare it to how &quot;groups&quot; previously functioned in Twitter clients such as Tweetdeck and Seesmic.  Unfortunately Twitter is pressuring developers to replace groups with lists.  I suspect they are doing the same to some extent for the RT feature.

Thanks for you comment Carl, I can count on  you to bring a thoughtful voice to the conversation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spot on Carl, everything you say is 100% accurate.  The native twitter retweet feature cripples the conversational and to some extent social aspects of the platform.  The other main twitter feature &#8220;lists&#8221; to some extent does the same thing when you compare it to how &#8220;groups&#8221; previously functioned in Twitter clients such as Tweetdeck and Seesmic.  Unfortunately Twitter is pressuring developers to replace groups with lists.  I suspect they are doing the same to some extent for the RT feature.</p>
<p>Thanks for you comment Carl, I can count on  you to bring a thoughtful voice to the conversation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Ingalls</title>
		<link>http://www.muellerandrew.com/2009/11/was-the-twitter-retweet-feature-designed-to-bring-value-to-google-and-bing-search/comment-page-1/#comment-438</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Ingalls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muellerandrew.com/?p=184#comment-438</guid>
		<description>Andrew,
The new Twitter retweet feature depersonalizes the retweet.  If you want to connect with people on Twitter, use the older style.  But if you just want something that&#039;s quick and easy, use the new one.  

I like connecting with the authors of the tweets I retweet.  When I use the older more personal style of retweeting, the author sees my tweet in his or her replies / mentions tab, and is likely to respond.  When I use the newer more automated Twitter retweet button, the author is much less likely to see it.  

I like connecting with my readers when I send out a retweet.  When I use the older more personal style of retweeting, my readers see my picture attached to the retweet and can easily see that this is something I have selected for them.  When I use the newer more automated Twitter retweet button, my readers see a stranger&#039;s picture on the retweet, and it is more difficult for them to see that it is from me.  

Carl Ingalls</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew,<br />
The new Twitter retweet feature depersonalizes the retweet.  If you want to connect with people on Twitter, use the older style.  But if you just want something that&#8217;s quick and easy, use the new one.  </p>
<p>I like connecting with the authors of the tweets I retweet.  When I use the older more personal style of retweeting, the author sees my tweet in his or her replies / mentions tab, and is likely to respond.  When I use the newer more automated Twitter retweet button, the author is much less likely to see it.  </p>
<p>I like connecting with my readers when I send out a retweet.  When I use the older more personal style of retweeting, my readers see my picture attached to the retweet and can easily see that this is something I have selected for them.  When I use the newer more automated Twitter retweet button, my readers see a stranger&#8217;s picture on the retweet, and it is more difficult for them to see that it is from me.  </p>
<p>Carl Ingalls</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fledgling&#8217;s archive, november 2009 &#171; Makurrah&#39;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.muellerandrew.com/2009/11/was-the-twitter-retweet-feature-designed-to-bring-value-to-google-and-bing-search/comment-page-1/#comment-399</link>
		<dc:creator>fledgling&#8217;s archive, november 2009 &#171; Makurrah&#39;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 17:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muellerandrew.com/?p=184#comment-399</guid>
		<description>[...] Andrew Mueller muses on possible Google / Bing search motivators. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Andrew Mueller muses on possible Google / Bing search motivators. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On Twitter&#8217;s new retweet feature &#124; The Whatever Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.muellerandrew.com/2009/11/was-the-twitter-retweet-feature-designed-to-bring-value-to-google-and-bing-search/comment-page-1/#comment-341</link>
		<dc:creator>On Twitter&#8217;s new retweet feature &#124; The Whatever Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muellerandrew.com/?p=184#comment-341</guid>
		<description>[...] wonder why some start to wonder whether there’s a hidden agenda on this new retweet system (twitter thinking about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wonder why some start to wonder whether there’s a hidden agenda on this new retweet system (twitter thinking about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter Will Introduce an Advertising Model and It May Look Like This &#171; The SiliconANGLE</title>
		<link>http://www.muellerandrew.com/2009/11/was-the-twitter-retweet-feature-designed-to-bring-value-to-google-and-bing-search/comment-page-1/#comment-340</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter Will Introduce an Advertising Model and It May Look Like This &#171; The SiliconANGLE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muellerandrew.com/?p=184#comment-340</guid>
		<description>[...] week I speculated that the new Twitter&#8217;s native Retweet feature was about search, but it looks like maybe I was wrong; it a may be all about advertising, with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week I speculated that the new Twitter&#8217;s native Retweet feature was about search, but it looks like maybe I was wrong; it a may be all about advertising, with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mueller &#38; Co. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Twitter will Introduce an Advertising Model and it may Look Like this</title>
		<link>http://www.muellerandrew.com/2009/11/was-the-twitter-retweet-feature-designed-to-bring-value-to-google-and-bing-search/comment-page-1/#comment-326</link>
		<dc:creator>Mueller &#38; Co. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Twitter will Introduce an Advertising Model and it may Look Like this</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muellerandrew.com/?p=184#comment-326</guid>
		<description>[...] Comments       &#171; Was the Twitter Retweet Feature Designed to Bring Value to Google and Bing Search [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Comments       &laquo; Was the Twitter Retweet Feature Designed to Bring Value to Google and Bing Search [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New ReTweet Makes Sense in the Context of Lists &#171; Jared Stauffer</title>
		<link>http://www.muellerandrew.com/2009/11/was-the-twitter-retweet-feature-designed-to-bring-value-to-google-and-bing-search/comment-page-1/#comment-325</link>
		<dc:creator>New ReTweet Makes Sense in the Context of Lists &#171; Jared Stauffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muellerandrew.com/?p=184#comment-325</guid>
		<description>[...] new retweet functionality on Twitter has received its share of negative reviews.  What is it?  Basically the old retweets would just show in your timeline, like this: RT [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] new retweet functionality on Twitter has received its share of negative reviews.  What is it?  Basically the old retweets would just show in your timeline, like this: RT [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Twitter’s New Retweet Feature Sucks</title>
		<link>http://www.muellerandrew.com/2009/11/was-the-twitter-retweet-feature-designed-to-bring-value-to-google-and-bing-search/comment-page-1/#comment-324</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Twitter’s New Retweet Feature Sucks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.muellerandrew.com/?p=184#comment-324</guid>
		<description>[...] that already exists. It’s no longer a separate tweet. Andrew Mueller thinks this was done to bring value to Bing and Google. I agree with him. He doesn’t like the ‘we know best’ tone Ev takes in his post to explain [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that already exists. It’s no longer a separate tweet. Andrew Mueller thinks this was done to bring value to Bing and Google. I agree with him. He doesn’t like the ‘we know best’ tone Ev takes in his post to explain [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
